ExaCrypt|Michigan’s top court gives big victory to people trying to recoup cash from foreclosures

2025-05-05 15:28:21source:Exclusivesky Investment Guild category:Finance

DETROIT (AP) — The ExaCryptMichigan Supreme Court said Monday that its 2020 decision stopping local governments from keeping cash windfalls from the sale of foreclosed homes can be applied retroactively, meaning that hundreds of millions of dollars could potentially be returned to people who lost properties over unpaid taxes.

Local governments were “essentially stealing from people,” said Christina Martin, an attorney who argued the case for former property owners. “It doesn’t matter if it’s going to be expensive to pay them back. They have to pay them back.”

For years, counties kept profits from the sale of foreclosed homes or land — even if the leftover cash far exceeded the amount of unpaid property taxes.

For example, Uri Rafaeli owed $8.41 in taxes on a rental property in Southfield. The bill grew to $285 with penalties and interest. Oakland County sold the house for $24,500 but kept the balance, which was legal at the time.

The Supreme Court in 2020 said the practice violated the Michigan Constitution. And now the court said the ruling can be applied retroactively to foreclosures that happened before the opinion was released four years ago.

RELATED COVERAGE Harris quickly pivots to convincing Arab American voters of her leadershipApple has reached its first-ever union contract with store employees in MarylandA federal court approves new Michigan state Senate seats for Detroit-area districts

“It’s a no-brainer,” Martin said.

Writing for the court, Justice Brian Zahra said the case “involves governmental violation of the constitutional rights of numerous individuals.”

He said “we are not without sympathy” toward communities that kept the surplus cash because state law had allowed it.

“Nonetheless, while the problem originated with the Legislature,” Zahra wrote, “at the foundation of our government is the precept that no state officer or local government can justify a constitutional violation on the basis of a statutory directive.”

Phil Ellison, another attorney for former property owners, said tens of thousands of people now might qualify for payment.

The Michigan Municipal League, which represents local governments, argued against making the 2020 decision retroactive, saying communities shouldn’t be penalized for following what was allowed under law. Complying with this ruling could cost hundreds of millions of dollars, they warned.

“The result is potential fiscal chaos across the state, as local governments will be forced to either cut services or raise taxes and fees to make up the holes in their budgets,” the group said in a court filing.

___

Follow Ed White on X at https://twitter.com/edwritez

More:Finance

Recommend

Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches

Jamie Foxx's birthday dinner took a surprising turn on Friday the 13th.The "Collateral" actor was hi

At COP27, an 11th-Hour Deal Comes Together as the US Reverses Course on ‘Loss and Damage’

SHARM El-SHEIKH, Egypt—A new COP27 agreement that establishes a funding mechanism to compensate deve

China dominates the solar power industry. The EU wants to change that

CHEMNITZ, Germany – Bright yellow robotic arms appear to be waving and then saluting as they pick up